There's no excuse for the shutdown, and the software vendor that sold the
application to the Government should be debarred and assessed penalties.
Perhaps this will still occur when the GAO performs an audit.
--
Michael D. Long
<gbarbour_at_csc.com> wrote in message
news:415008e4$1_1_at_baen1673807.greenlnk.net...
>> | Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>>
>> And weeding out unqualified developers would be a bad thing?
>>
>> Actually, the problem is more than the developers -- it starts with
> project
>> specification (or non-specification) and just reverberates on down to
>> unqualified developers.
>>
>> ++ mcs
>>
> Designers such as for bridges or buildings are publically
> responsible/liable for their constructions.
> How liable are Software engineers? Consider this link?
> http://software.silicon.com/applications/0,39024653,39124122,00.htm
>
> Are the consequences severe enough? Who do you blame? Who is liable? Who
> is
> responsible?
>
> Shabble.
>
>
Received on Tue Sep 21 2004 - 18:25:43 CDT
