Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> Daniel Morgan wrote:
>
>
> Besides, as you point out: MS *is* putting that sort of stuff into their
> product, so there's less loss in Oracle being open about how they did 15
> years ago. :) They might be giving away "trade secrets", but they're
> secrets nobody really wants to see any more because they've independently
> acquired the technology.
>
> Regards
> HJR
Puting it in at a very very high cost in effort and dollars. I can't see
Larry giving Bill anything ... and visa versa of course.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)
Received on Mon Sep 13 2004 - 23:35:31 CDT
