Re: Dynamic SGA and pinned

• Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

> > As I wrote usually it makes no sense. But saying the feature is useless
> > is
> > too strong as well...
>
>
> Well, I didn't, actually. I sayed it wasn't actually dynamic, and hence
> that 'dynamic SGA' doesn't actually exist as a feature. Which we've
> convincingly demonstrated is indeed true, for Linux at any rate. That the
> pools within the SGA are truly dynamic is also undoubtedly true, and I've
> said nothing at all to knock that.
>
> Let's not start putting words into others' mouths, eh?

I agree, you didn't... but this is the impression I get reading your posts... therefore I'm happy to heard that we agree on this point as well :-)

Have a nice day.

Chris

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

• Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=