Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is 10g much slower than 9i?

Re: Is 10g much slower than 9i?

From: Andy Finkenstadt <kahuna_at_panix.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:57:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <c3eu89$cn5$1@reader1.panix.com>


In <c9bc36ff.0403160905.2cd7d8b6_at_posting.google.com> ramon_at_conexus.net (Ramon F Herrera) writes:
>Old Oracle Server:
>Dell PowerEdge 2550 with 1 2.4 GHz CPU and 2.5 GB RAM
>PERC RAID chip
>RedHat 9
>Oracle 9iR2

>New Oracle Server:
>Dell PowerEdge 2650 with 2 3.0 GHz CPUs and 2 GB RAM
>Adaptec RAID card with full cache
>RedHat Enterprise Linux 3
>Oracle 10gR1

Stop right there. Our experience shows that the Adaptec RAID card under Linux kernel 2.4.latest as of about a month ago is much, much slower than the equivalent Mylex DAC960-driver raid card.

So much slower in our environment that we put our "spare" mylex card in the new failover computer that used to have the adaptec card.

Andy

-- 
Andrew Finkenstadt (http://www.finkenstadt.com/andy/)
Received on Fri Mar 19 2004 - 07:57:29 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US