Re: 2-node 9iRAC --> 2nd instance performance problem

What does it mean by the increased message wait time given that they are the same query?

Ernest

ernestsiu_at_yahoo.com (Ernest Siu) wrote in message news:<2833144d.0403151631.13528fc9_at_posting.google.com>...
> One key thing I left off is: I'm using a WAN emulator (BSD DummyNet)
> between the two 9iRAC nodes, however with only 0ms delay (yes, I
> intend to run some distance test later, but I don't expect it to have
> trouble with 0ms). No distance element at storage level. I know this
> is out of the ordinary, but I believe it should at least work with a
> 0ms emulator (given that the emulator works properly). I suspect
> there's something wrong with the DummyNet box in terms of network
> setting....
>
> I'm looking into 3 items, the time_waited for: gcs remote message, ges
> remote message and rdbms ipc message. Performing the same query of
> SELECT 1000000 rows:
>
> ges re-msg gcs re-msg rdbms ipc msg Time-to-perform
> 0ms Bad Box 848132 1691930 5918365 8480 seconds
> 0ms Good Box 5808 11455 35281 56 seconds
>
> The time-waited is proportional to the actual performance. Hmm... I
> suspect there's something wrong with the network setting on the
> DummyNet that it doesn't like. What could it be: MTU, Window-size,
> Duplex? Or the setting on the 2 hosts?
>
> Ernest
Received on Wed Mar 17 2004 - 11:17:38 CST