"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message
news:1079155446.258063_at_yasure...
> Howard J. Rogers wrote:
>
> > I think that's my point (though it's not my name!). Lots of people
believe
> > all this cache fusion baloney, as though Parallel Server was just a bad
> > dream. It's still here, though. New name, same issues (reduced,
undoubtedly.
> > But not eliminated).
>
> So much for going back end editing and not proof reading.
>
> RAC is not OPS. There is not a single line of OPS code in RAC as far as
> I know. It is a completely different animal built on the fact that
> everyone agrees that OPS was a good concept and a bad implementation.
That is as I understand it untrue, and very bad marketing on Oracle's
behalf. It is interesting that the message has changed with grid which is
based on 'proven RAC technology'.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
Received on Mon Mar 15 2004 - 03:43:38 CST
