Re: SQL Fun Challenge #2

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:11:12 -0800
Message-ID: <1078528236.976584@yasure>

Brian Peasland wrote:

>>Oh, triplets are perfectly possible. But you'll find it
>>really hard to age them in years so the product of
>>their ages is 36.
>>;)

>
>
> Not unless they are all 3.3019272488946266838746099524091 years old. ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Brian

When calcualted with a binary or decimal calculation engine? ;-)

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

Received on Fri Mar 05 2004 - 17:11:12 CST