Re: Sizing Locally Managed Tablespace

Ronnie wrote:

> Exactly. I am talking about Uniform extent sizes.
>
> -Ron

Then it depends on the sizes of your tables. You can either choose some arbitrary value such as 64K for everything, I think Howard Rogers would advocate that. Or you can create a tablespace for small tables, say 64K, one for medium size tables, say 5M, and one for large tables, say 100M. Which is something I tend toward. I think the difference in performance between the two different methodologies is likely negligible.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)