Re: RMAN Backups/Recoveries

From: Ofer Razon <orazon_at_012.net.il>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:33:44 +0200
Message-ID: <brqi3r$6m5$1@news2.netvision.net.il>

Hi.
Actually we can define the solution I`m looking for as : Implementing a standby DB by using RMAN.

Is it possible?

"Bricklen" <bricklen-rem_at_yahoo.comz> wrote in message news:aK1Eb.98673$bC.65843_at_clgrps13...
> Ofer Razon wrote:
>
> > I think you didn`t understand me.
> > I`ll run the full recovery once.
> > From now and on, I`ll continue to do an incr. backup from my source DB,
and
> > on my target DB I`ll run an incremental recovery every day. I WONT OPEN
THE
> > DB.
> >
> > So, when I`ll decide to open this DB, I`ll get the latest version of my
> > source DB.
> > Afterwards, if I`ll want to run the process again - I`ll start with the
full
> > recovery....
>
> Not having read any of this thread except this last post, this may
> already have been mentioned:
> Are you asking about a physical standby database? The standby is in a
> continual state of recovery with archived logs from primary being
> applied at the specified intervals on the standby db. I suppose this
> could be referred to as "incremental recovery" (a misnomer, but what the
> hey)
>
> anyways, I'll bow out again.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bricklen
Received on Wed Dec 17 2003 - 15:33:44 CST