Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RH Linux 8 vs Windows XP -- Question...

Re: RH Linux 8 vs Windows XP -- Question...

From: Brian Peasland <dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:27:38 GMT
Message-ID: <3F6F06DA.7EFE898E@remove_spam.peasland.com>


When you ran the test on your Linux box, where you using a GUI environment like KDE or Gnome? It's been my experience that these can be resource pigs, but Linux without the GUI environment runs much faster than Windows.

HTH,
Brian

Jan van Mourik wrote:
>
> Gentlemen...
>
> I'm wondering if anybody has encountered something similar...
> I'm running Tom Kyte's script to create BIG_TABLE on two play
> databases I run, one on RH Linux 8, one on XP. They have been
> configured similarly, init.ora parameters are pretty much the same.
> Yet, look at these tkprof snippets:
>
> XP
> INSERT /*+ APPEND */ into big_table
> select rownum+:b1,
> OWNER, OBJECT_NAME, SUBOBJECT_NAME,
> OBJECT_ID, DATA_OBJECT_ID,
> OBJECT_TYPE, CREATED, LAST_DDL_TIME,
> TIMESTAMP, STATUS, TEMPORARY,
> GENERATED, SECONDARY
> from big_table
> where rownum <= :b2-:b1
>
> call count cpu elapsed disk query current
> rows
> ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> --------
> Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
> 0
> Execute 6 5.37 10.97 8365 14635 2133
> 970885
> Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
> 0
> ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> --------
> total 7 5.37 10.97 8365 14635 2133
> 970885
>
> versus Linux:
>
> call count cpu elapsed disk query current
> rows
> ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> --------
> Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
> 0
> Execute 6 12.81 33.79 7601 14635 2130
> 970482
> Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
> 0
> ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> --------
> total 7 12.82 33.79 7601 14635 2130
> 970482
>
> Roughly the same number of rows, but a big difference in cpu and
> elapsed. XP is much faster!!!
> When I run the workload simulation setup from Kyte's book 'Effective
> Oracle by design' (p. 314) the linux box beats the pants of the XP.
> But loading the table is a lot slower. Makes me wonder if something in
> my Linux setup is bad...
> Any ideas?
>
> jan

-- 
===================================================================

Brian Peasland
dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com

Remove the "remove_spam." from the email address to email me.


"I can give it to you cheap, quick, and good. Now pick two out of
 the three"
Received on Mon Sep 22 2003 - 09:27:38 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US