Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Fed Up with being a DBA

Re: Fed Up with being a DBA

From: Domenic G. <domenicg_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 14 Sep 2003 13:06:57 -0700
Message-ID: <c7e08a19.0309141206.288c2502@posting.google.com>


Excuse me Mr. Oracle Instructor ...

Spatial is garbage, you can't even export/import a schema with sdo_geometry columns in it without getting a bucket full of errors. I'm waiting for Oracle to remove RAW, LONG RAW, etc. from their own system tablespace before they tell everyone else to move to BLOB and CLOB. Oracle is hypocritical -- they don't practice what they preach!! Do a desc on DBA_TRIGGERS and see if the trigger code is stored in a CLOB. "Oracle Corporation strongly recommends moving to CLOBs ... ".

What I would really like them to do is put in a command to clone a schema without doing export/import -- give me something useful instead of reverse-key indexes on sequence-driven columns, whose performance gain is like a drop in the ocean!!

Domenic.

Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1063489904.682513_at_yasure>...
> Domenic G. wrote:
>
> >Daniel is so busy teaching theoretical examples he just doesn't have
> >the real-world experience that comes with an application where you
> >CANNOT inject hints such as these into the code. I use COST as well,
> >when appropriate, but if Oracle really has fully dropped RBO in 10g, I
> >think it will be suicide for them in some way. Don't abandon
> >something that works. And, by the way, the reason why RBO doesn't
> >pick up on new features is because Oracle is too lazy to retrofit the
> >RBO code with them -- function index, partition, etc.
> >
> >Cheers ...
> >Domenic.
> >
> >
> >
> Daniel has been teaching part-time for four years and has been in the
> IS/IT industry as a developer and
> DBA likely since before you were born.
>
> I've got real-world experience that goes back to breadboards and
> punchcards so be careful about drawing
> conclusions based on a lack of knowledge of the subject. If you wish to
> criticize I'd suggest you stick to those
> things of which you have some actual knowledge.
>
> If you think the reason for the death of the RBO is Oracle's lazyiness
> ... you are seriously lacking insight into
> even the most basic aspect of what Oracle is doing and why. When was the
> last time you read those 17 rules?
> Think you can do better and handle all of the capabilities now in the
> product? And yes I mean all of them. I
> mean spatial, I mean text, I mean CLOB and BLOB and XML, new table
> types, user-defined data types,
> new index types, all of them, and all of the features still on the
> drawing board and not yet implemented.
>
> If you can ... I'll get you a guest lecture position at the University
> of Washington.
Received on Sun Sep 14 2003 - 15:06:57 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US