Re: Need SQL Server Temp Table equivalent (challenge!)

From: Galen Boyer <galenboyer_at_hotpop.com>
Date: 22 Jul 2003 20:30:13 -0500
Message-ID: <uispuc9sa.fsf@standardandpoors.com>

On 22 Jul 2003, kin_ng5_at_yahoo.com wrote:

> The real requirement is having a DB that can adapt to the
> change of the business WITHOUT changing the DB design AND
> programs.

Come on. Either you want a relational database to be used properly, or you don't want a relational database. The reason you choose a relational database is for the exact reason that you are trying to avoid, which is having to figure out how your data relates within your enterprise, which includes the rework and redesign which is required if your business changes. Once you deviate from this, you might as well not use the RDBMS at all.

-- 
Galen Boyer

Received on Tue Jul 22 2003 - 20:30:13 CDT