Absolutely true... and I should have qualified my original comment. My
concern was multiple-instance-cross-interconnect traffic. And in an
active-passive-passive-active configuration, you aren't going to get any of
that, so yes it's do-able.
Regards
HJR
"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ba1b0r$6qf$1$8302bc10_at_news.demon.co.uk...
>
> Just one comment in line.
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Jonathan Lewis
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
> The educated person is not the person
> who can answer the questions, but the
> person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr
>
>
> One-day tutorials:
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html
>
> ____Denmark__May 21-23rd
> ____Sweden___June
> ____Finland__September
> ____Norway___September
>
> Three-day seminar:
> see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
> ____UK_(Manchester)_May x 2
> ____Estonia___June 4th - 6th
> ____Australia_June 18th - 20th (Perth)
> ____Australia_June 23rd - 25th (t.b.a)
> ____USA_(CA, TX)_August
>
> The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>
>
> "Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:_QVwa.35126$1s1.509881_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> >
> > > time finding out a good answer to relay to them. They want to
> know wether
> > > or not they can implement two or more RAC clustered databases on
> the same
> > > hardware running at the same time.
> >
> > Yes they can. Is it a good idea to do so? Doubt it.
> >
>
> One possible scenario where this might be sensible.
> You have two applications, which are not RAC-compliant -
> i.e. no chance of two-node RAC scaling at all.
>
> For resilience purposes, you set up application A
> with node1 its active node and node2 its passive node;
> then set up application B so that node 2 is its active
> node and node1 its passive node.
>
> Each application is (close to) running on a dedicated
> server system, but with a failover position where both
> applications will be running on one server.
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 15 2003 - 20:06:50 CDT
