Re: Schema Placement for Purchased Apps

From: Howard J. Rogers <howardjr20002_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:03:02 +1000
Message-ID: <bIlla.11491$1s1.178775@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

"Gabriel Gonzalez" <no-spam_at_no-spam.com> wrote in message news:m_ydnVXbwKZ4MAijXTWcqA_at_giganews.com...
> > Different block sizes are there for one reason only - to transport
> tablespaces
> > from different block sized databases into a staging database before
> > summarization and so on into the data warehouse.
>
> Hmmm... Is this documented anywhere? I mean, it makes sense now that you
> mention it, but I've not noticed the feature treated as a "by the way..."
> issue in the docs. I mean, if this is what they are there for, the docs
> should mention it somewhere, so maybe I just haven't seen it. It's not
like
> I sit around and read the docs all day either!

They don't tell you that ASSM should really only be used in a RAC environment -or, rather, that that is what it was really designed for, at any rate. Neither do they tell you that the SPFILE was RAC-inspired.

Still all true, nonetheless.

Regards
HJR Received on Thu Apr 10 2003 - 17:03:02 CDT