Re: index rebuilding...

"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:NP60a.41233$jM5.103756_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
>
> "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message
> news:3e3fb9f6$0$248$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...
> > "Noons" <nsouto_at_optusnet.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9318EB0C520B9mineminemine_at_210.49.20.254...
> > > Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com> wrote in
> > > news:b1m6e30258f_at_drn.newsguy.com and I quote:
> > > Has anyone here tried to dump the first extent off a LMT,
> > > table with just one block of data, 64K uniform alloc, 4096
> > > block size? Ie, 16 blocks/extent? Now, that was a surprise
> > > for me: Oracle takes an apparently weird choice as to which
> > > block gets data first! Weird, I tell you. :)
> >
> > Take a look at http://www.oaktable.net/fullArticle.jsp?id=4 which I
think
> > deals with what you are on about about halfway down.
>
> It's a good article. But it contains one minor error. Locally-managed
system
> tablespaces are NOT the default in 9iR2.

Hi Howard,

Ummmm, yes they are ? If you do not specify an extent management clause, the default is LMT, regardless of the System TS.

>They are if you use the dbca to
> create your database (the error I fell into). But issue manual 'create
> database' commands, and DMT for system is still the default.

This is correct. The default TS for *System* is DMT, but regardless, the default for all other tablespaces is LMT.

Cheers

Richard Received on Wed Feb 05 2003 - 07:42:22 CST