Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: One vs many databases

Re: One vs many databases

From: David Sharples <david.sharples3_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 10:19:54 -0000
Message-ID: <ezyR9.416$rJ.4693@newsfep4-win.server.ntli.net>


what do you think he does all day then?

"Pablo Sanchez" <pablo_at_dev.null> wrote in message news:Xns92F8D10C06C20pingottpingottbah_at_209.242.64.107...
> marist89 <member15835_at_dbforums.com> wrote in
> news:2344964.1041630637_at_dbforums.com:
>
> >
> >> Ask this question Thomas Kyte from Oracle and he will tell you
> >> the same.
> >> He is one of the few Oracle authorities from which you really
> >> can learn,
> >> most people in this area have no real knowledge from modern
> >> system management. they only want to keep their job and make it
> >> as difficult as possible, like this people telling you to
> >> reorganize database,
> >> indexes ...
> >>
> >>
> > If that's what TK says, then it carries a lot of weight with me.
> > However, this would be the one time I disagree with him.
>
> I would have to guess that Thomas has been misunderstood because as
> you point out, it simply makes good common operational sense to house
> data separately when the business demands it.
>
> btw, as near as I can tell, I do _not_ believe that Thomas has been
> doing any operational work in recent years. *smirk* I'll let Thomas
> answer that one ... <g>
> --
> Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering
> http://www.hpdbe.com
Received on Sat Jan 04 2003 - 04:19:54 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US