When you said "complex", were you comparing J2EE to MSFT .NET? Or were
you comapring it to some other alternatives of building a web
application?
"Vladimir M. Zakharychev" <bob_at_dpsp-yes.com> wrote in message news:<aues6g$qfs$1_at_babylon.agtel.net>...
> Well, that's just my personal attitude - I dislike everything that is
> unnecessary complex and basically denies KISS principle. J2EE
> is just that sort of technology - it is very complex, and it applies
> the requirement for complexity to everything you do. Just look
> how complex it is to maintain persistence in a BMP bean (or even
> in a CMP one, though it's much simpler) and how much additional
> classes are needed, and how much additional work they do for a
> simple task of storing and retrieving a row from database table...
> And this inherent complexity is everywhere in J2EE... But sure it
> gives J2EE developers a good opportunity for excellent earnings
> (and for hardware makers too, because you certainly need very
> powerful and expensive hardware to run these J2EE monsters...) :)
>
> My $0.02
>
> --
> Vladimir Zakharychev (bob@dpsp-yes.com) http://www.dpsp-yes.com
> Dynamic PSP(tm) - the first true RAD toolkit for Oracle-based internet applications.
> All opinions are mine and do not necessarily go in line with those of my employer.
>
>
> "John" <jbradshaw777_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:f2f59d82.0212250943.6c568da4_at_posting.google.com...
> > > Hmm... If by the keyword "Java" you are referring to J2EE then I hope
> > > you are right. :)
> >
> > Hi, could you explain why you hope J2EE would die - that's what you
> > meant, is it not? I am currently groping in the dark in the JAVA world
> > and am interested in any opinions for and against it.
> >
> > - John
Received on Fri Dec 27 2002 - 12:45:32 CST
