Re: RAC, CFS and online backups

In article <3df11fea$1_2_at_mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com>, "Paul says...
>

snip>>
>Howard (and Pete, if you're there), I accept what you say, and I don't
>dispute it for a moment.
>
>As I said, I have **no evidence**. I'm just cautious about combining new
>features. Surely you will accept that in the past we have, on occasion, been
>bitten.
>
>I'm an avid Oracle supporter, and (I like to think, anyway) a reasonably
>competent DBA. But I have a preference for introducing changes one at a
>time.
>
>And none of this is intended to sound in any way negative about Oracle
>Corporation's offerings.
>
>Regards,
>Paul
>

Exactly why I had two perspectives in my posting, one of which was you have to be cautious about doing anything in an HA environment. I totally agree that people have been bitten in the past (heck, I can remember being bittne myself with the 6.0.34 to 6.0.36 patch!)

HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.

Pete

SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements; Received on Fri Dec 06 2002 - 19:05:21 CST