Re: commits are not really commits

From: Martin Doherty <martin.doherty_at_oorraaccllee.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 14:24:30 -0800
Message-ID: <1rQH9.12$Td5.59@news.oracle.com>

Connor,

Fascinating comment - "... commit are not really commits...." Can you expand a little on what this means? Does this impact the logical (programming) view point, or do you mean differences only in the physical implementation?

Thanks
Martin Doherty

Connor McDonald wrote:

>Ed Stevens wrote:
>
>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>
>plsql may not be a good one to use for the test because commit are not
>really commits so you get an artificial redo rate.
>
>also, its probably more important to check the wait times then total
>execution times - because one particular io configuration may cause some
>unrelated side-effect
>
>hth
>connor
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 05 2002 - 16:24:30 CST