True, but Sybrand has panache.
Jim
"Avi Abrami" <aabrami_at_intersystemsww.com> wrote in message
news:3D6DDD0B.1966B122_at_intersystemsww.com...
> Sybrand Bakker wrote:
> [*SNIP*]
> > IMHO, OO has already proven not to be the ultimate panache to solve
> [*SNIP*]
>
> Please excuse me, but I'm sure that many of the people who will
> read your reply, Sybrand, do not have an impressive command of
> the English language, and therefore I think it would help if I
> pointed out that "panache" and "panacea" are two completely
> different things -- and I think you intended to say "panacea"
> (and not "panache"), correct?
>
> Avi.
Received on Thu Aug 29 2002 - 07:44:23 CDT
