Re: Oracle 9i RAC

In article <Fb3b9.92256$8o4.12489_at_afrodite.telenet-ops.be>, "koert54" says...
>
>Running 9i 9.0.1.3 RAC on WIN2000 / IBM hardware / shared storage with fiber
>If it was up to me I would throw out RAC and either :
>1. make a fail over cluster (failsafe) - add memory and CPU
>2. if they insist on RAC - re-do it on Tru64 cluster (because of CLFS) or
>any unix flavour as long
>as it's not wintel
>

Another alternative would be to use the CFS from Oracle. I haven't touched it at all, but that would save you changing the hardware as well.

Pete
>
>"Scutty" <news_at_scutty.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:pan.2002.08.28.11.07.28.301.14437_at_scutty.co.uk...
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Just wondeign if anyone out there is using Oracle 9iRAC?
>> If you are what platform are you running and is it working ok?
>>
>> Only asking as we are mid-roll out on with a 9iRAC/Alpha tru-cluster
>> system and its been... interesting!
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andy
>
>

HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.

Pete

SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements; Received on Wed Aug 28 2002 - 12:39:22 CDT