Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> _sqlexec_progression_cost in 8.1.7
_sqlexec_progression_cost=0 is a required setting for Oracle
Applications 11i,
running the Cost-Based optimizer.
Would it make sense to use it with the Rule-based optimizer (e.g. in
Oracle Applications 11.0) ?
I don't think that the parameter applies only with the Cost-based
optimizer but
also with the Rule-based optimizer. The performance impact of the
default
value (1000) for this parameter in 8i relates to using
timed_statistics=TRUE
and SQL_TRACE=TRUE. I do have timed_statistics set and the developers
still have a number of programs where sql_trace=TRUE (or when an analyst
runs a report from the Applications, he enables tracing on the report).
So, should I set it to 0, in Oracle applications 11.0, Rule-Based on 8.1.7.2 ?
Per note 62143.1 on "Understanding and Tuning the Shared Pool in Oracle7, Oracle8 and Oracle8i" :
"SQLEXEC_PROGRESSION_COST parameter (8.1.5 onwards)
This is a hidden parameter which was introduced in Oracle 8.1.5. The
parameter is included here as the
default setting has caused some problems with SQL sharability. Setting
this parameter to 0 can avoid these
issues which result in multiple versions statements in the shared pool.
Eg: Add the following to the init.ora file
# _SQLEXEC_PROGRESSION_COST is set to ZERO to avoid SQL sharing issues
# See Note:62143.1 for details _sqlexec_progression_cost=0
Also, note 68955.1 recommends setting it to 0 to resolve "some cursor
sharing bugs
in Oracle8i".
I don't query V$SESSION_LONGOPS so it doesn't matter to me if this view
doesn't get
updated.
Received on Fri Aug 02 2002 - 09:34:06 CDT