Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: IMP: still more problems

Re: IMP: still more problems

From: Richard Foote <richard.foote_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 00:19:25 +1000
Message-ID: <Oce_8.39469$Hj3.117981@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>


Add a packet of minties (if you're game buddy) and things will really hot up !!

Dare ya

Richard
"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:ahbqep$vn2$1_at_lust.ihug.co.nz...
> And a packet of Jaffa Cakes... then you're on!
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
> "Richard Foote" <richard.foote_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:Ntd_8.39452$Hj3.119275_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> > Hi Howard,
> >
> > Not so sure.
> >
> > I think the days of having Export/Import as a backup/recovery strategy
are
> > definitely gone (not that I really think those days were really there).
I
> > think the incremental/cumulative components were always somewhat dubious
> in
> > that they apply at the object level (whereas RMAN has always been at the
> > block level - way way more useful). There have also been quite
significant
> > improvements with these utilities over the last few releases
> (transportable
> > tablespaces, tablespace level exports, filesize and multiple files,
> > flashback, resumable, query option (really nice) and I'm sure others).
> >
> > So I think they here to stay BUT to be used for what they're are
designed,
> > which is not to backup and protect the database.
> >
> > Let's keep these postings for 5 years and see who's right. 10 bucks ?
> >
> > Richard
> > "Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:ahbb1k$476$1_at_lust.ihug.co.nz...
> > > Just my tuppence-worth.
> > >
> > > Oracle is on record as saying that cumulative/incremental exports will
> be
> > > de-supported in the future, and (from memory only) the reason they
gave
> > was
> > > that RMAN is the cumulative/incremental guru in these parts.
> > >
> > > This is just my wild speculation (usual disclaimers apply) but I don't
> > > honestly see much of a future for export and import. You've got
> > > dbms_metadata in 9i for the structural components. You've got logminer
> for
> > > transactional replay. You've got other things besides... strikes me
that
> > the
> > > days of export/import are distinctly numbered.
> > >
> > > And it wouldn't surprise me in the least if one of the factors in that
> > > turned out to be exactly what you're saying: so much is happening in
the
> > > database that it gets harder and harder to update export/import to
keep
> > up.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > HJR
> > >
> > >
> > > "Chuck" <chuckh_at_softhome.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ah9nug$rb5fg$1_at_ID-85580.news.dfncis.de...
> > > >
> > > > "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message
> > > > news:tskgjusrf6nusjhskojhoq2057mj0em6c8_at_4ax.com...
> > > > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:34:57 -0400, "Chuck" <chuckh_at_softhome.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >I am encountering even *more* problems with the 8.1.7 import
> utility
> > on
> > > > AIX.
> > > > > >Am I doing something wrong or is this utility just a piece of
cr*p?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Latest issue. I am trying to use a norows full export to create
> > > indexes,
> > > > > >primary keys, constraints, grants etc. on a database that I
copied
> > from
> > > > > >another platform using CTAS on every table. (I used CTAS to load
> the
> > > > data
> > > > > >because import was too slow. It took 70+ hours whereas CTAS took
> > about
> > > > 3.)
> > > > > >The create index and alter statements are in the export file to
> > create
> > > > the
> > > > > >unique indexes for the PKs, then alter them to PK constraints. I
> can
> > > grep
> > > > > >them out of the file with no problem. The import however never
even
> > > tries
> > > > to
> > > > > >apply them. There are no errors in the log file indicating that
it
> > > failed
> > > > to
> > > > > >apply them for any reason. It just ignores them. It also ignores
> all
> > of
> > > > my
> > > > > >FK constraints.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Before I open a tar with oracle, is this expected behavior for
> > EXP/IMP?
> > > > Am I
> > > > > >forgetting something?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Here is the command I am using to run the export and the import.
> The
> > > last
> > > > > >line of the export log file says it finished with no warnings.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >exp user/pass file=norows full=y rows=n log=norows_export.log
> > > > > >imp user/pass file=norows full=y log=norows_import.log
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >I am encountering even *more* problems with the 8.1.7 import
> utility
> > on
> > > > AIX.
> > > > > >Am I doing something wrong or is this utility just a piece of
cr*p?
> > > > >
> > > > > Millions of people can use it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I used to be one of them - from version 7.0 to 8.1. But I keep
finding
> > > more
> > > > and more problems with a tool that used to work well. As features
were
> > > added
> > > > to the RDBMS, imp/exp just hasn't kept up. Wrong sizes exported for
> > > > datafiles, grants that are not exported, etc. I would warn anyone
who
> is
> > > > depending on it as a backup/restore method to reconsider. The most
> basic
> > > > function of a backup/restore solution is to backup data and restore
it
> > to
> > > > the same logical state as when it was backed up. EXP/IMP does not do
> > > that -
> > > > period. Is it any wonder Oracle keeps losing market share?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sat Jul 20 2002 - 09:19:25 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US