Re: The demise of the Oracle professional?

From: ronald <ronald_at_foo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:53:55 +0200
Message-ID: <ae56fm$4167m$1@ID-87429.news.dfncis.de>

"Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>

> > 2-tier (client-server) is not enough anymore, you know. How can
> > you achive load balancing with client-server architecture? How can
> > you achieve dynamic redeployment (software upgrades while the
> > system is running)? Fail-over? Clustering? Message-oriented
> > architecture?
>
> Seems to me that that is an argument for n-tier (where n = 3
> <vbg>) architecture 3-tier is not the same as j2ee.

J2EE is a superset of 3-tier architecture. What's your question?

> Microsoft.com handles load balancing pretty well on the
> whole. I wouldn't be looking for J2EE in that environment.

DOS applications do their job well too, but the world moved forward nonetheless. Received on Tue Jun 11 2002 - 10:53:55 CDT