Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: lies damn lies and benchmarks

Re: lies damn lies and benchmarks

From: Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:53:14 -0600
Message-ID: <KXwC8.17$eR3.26425@news.uswest.net>

"Mike Ault" <mikerault_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message news:37fab3ab.0205090536.7f87ff45_at_posting.google.com... > "Pablo Sanchez" <pablo_at_dev.null> wrote in message news:<bslC8.377$pa4.220395_at_news.uswest.net>...
> > "Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
> > news:3cd9ad81$0$15476$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> > > In article <1%aC8.235$pa4.46349_at_news.uswest.net>, you said (and
I
> > quote):
> > > >
> > > > I'm curious, why do you doubt it? Why do you think it's not a
> > good
> > > > product?
> > > > --
> > >
> > > Because it fails to provide a number of features I consider
> > fundamental
> > > for a product to be called a Relational Database Management
System.
> >
> > Which features does MS SQL not provide that you consider
fundamental
> > in an RDBMS?

> >

> > Thx!

>
> MySQL is not ...

Mike,

We're talking about MS SQL, not MySQL.

Thx!

--
Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering
mailto:pablo_at_hpdbe.com
http://www.hpdbe.com
Available for short-term and long-term contracts
Received on Thu May 09 2002 - 10:53:14 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US