Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Replication Question:

Re: Replication Question:

From: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:59:02 -0800
Message-ID: <1PAM7.81$9f2.7645@inet16.us.oracle.com>


Yes, parent and child should be together for the very reason you mention.

--
HTH.  Additions and corrections welcome.

Pete
Author of "Oracle8i: Architecture and Administration Exam Cram"
Currently writing the "Oracle9i New Features for Administrators Exam Cram"

"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook

"Oh no, it's not.  It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA

"Daniel N." <daniel.navarro_at_intervoice-brite.com> wrote in message
news:2a49a9a4.0111211126.6236ca9b_at_posting.google.com...

> All,
>
> Does anyone know what would happen, or what the effects are, if you
> were to take a child table (replicated object) from the same refresh
> group that it parent resides, and put it in a separate refresh group?
> Would the Distributed DB System eventually come out of sync?
>
> We have tested this in our lab environment with no problems, but that
> is not always the same result in production. If anyone has tried this,
> could you please reply with any problems you may have encountered.
>
> Oracle 8.1.7 on HP_UX 11.0
> Single Master - 3 clusters.
>
> TIA,
> Dan N.
Received on Mon Nov 26 2001 - 17:59:02 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US