Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Replication Question:
Yes, parent and child should be together for the very reason you mention.
-- HTH. Additions and corrections welcome. Pete Author of "Oracle8i: Architecture and Administration Exam Cram" Currently writing the "Oracle9i New Features for Administrators Exam Cram" "Controlling developers is like herding cats." Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook "Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!" Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA "Daniel N." <daniel.navarro_at_intervoice-brite.com> wrote in message news:2a49a9a4.0111211126.6236ca9b_at_posting.google.com...Received on Mon Nov 26 2001 - 17:59:02 CST
> All,
>
> Does anyone know what would happen, or what the effects are, if you
> were to take a child table (replicated object) from the same refresh
> group that it parent resides, and put it in a separate refresh group?
> Would the Distributed DB System eventually come out of sync?
>
> We have tested this in our lab environment with no problems, but that
> is not always the same result in production. If anyone has tried this,
> could you please reply with any problems you may have encountered.
>
> Oracle 8.1.7 on HP_UX 11.0
> Single Master - 3 clusters.
>
> TIA,
> Dan N.