Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle versus MS Sql Server

Re: Oracle versus MS Sql Server

From: ls cheng <g-e-n-o_at_europe.com>
Date: 24 Oct 2001 07:07:19 -0700
Message-ID: <b352e1b3.0110240607.806def6@posting.google.com>


Many times Oracle cant install properly is due to Windows problems, like it or not I rarely ran into installation issues in linux/unix platform but on Windows itīs quite often but after diagnosting the problem itīs always Windows problem, many times we format and after format it works

allanwtham_at_yahoo.com (godmann) wrote in message news:<95cd51c.0110240136.5ccc6c26_at_posting.google.com>...

> "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message news:<3bcef4fa$0$231$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>...

> > "Porus H Havewala" <porushh_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message
> > news:3BCE7A7D.5FB0E9DF_at_bigpond.com...
> > > Microsoft Sqlserver 2000 versus Oracle
> > > SQL SERVER TECHNICAL LIMITATIONS
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > By Faulkner, Kent (kent.faulkner_at_trane.com) USA
> > Try posting this to comp.databases.sql-server (or whatever the *relevant* ng
> > is called). This is irrelevant here and you should get a decent critique
> > (and some nice flames) there. You might of course also ask the copyright
> > holder for permission before posting his work all over the place.
> 
> Hi there,
> 
>  Niall is right. Next time do not post anything *sensitive* enough to spark 
> the flame. IMO, comp.databases.oracle.server is for those who take it seriously
> and want the questions answered.I think this is the longest thread I've ever seen.
> 
> Allan W. Tham
> DBA
Received on Wed Oct 24 2001 - 09:07:19 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US