Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Why doesn't Oracle care about Linux as IBM does?
On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Dino Hsu wrote:
> Furthermore, many people here (senior DBA's) don't think of Linux as a
> 'Unix'. To them, Unix means IBM AIX, Sun Solaris, HP-UX, etc.. This
> may be due to Linux's growing up from PC-based machines, although
> later ported to many different H/W platforms.
Why doesn't Oracle care much for Linux? Let us count the ways:
When you look at it, SCO UnixWare is probably more scalable than Linux - but do you see Oracle rushing to support it? Be glad that Oracle does what they do with Linux; I would understand them dropping it completely.
Larry occasionally has bad things to say about Linux - last I heard, he was admonishing Apps consultants not to even THINK about Linux. But then again, he is hawking that Linux-based network terminal, too.
I do understand DB2's fixation on Linux - with it's "shared nothing" architecture, it is probably a better fit.
| Boo, Forever | | | | Spinning like a ghost on the bottom of a top, | | I'm haunted by all the space that I will live | | without you. | | | | -Richard Brautigan. | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Charles J. Fisher | cfisher@rhadmin.org | http://rhadmin.org /