Re: Limit on row inserts when using TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE?

On 27 Jul 2001, hyldgaard_at_hotmail.com wrote:

> This goes on very well as long as the number of inserted rows
> are low (less than 1000). However if this is extended to
> several thousands records then the subselect in step 2 fails
> (returns NULL).

Can you mimic this larger example with straight SQL and have it complete successfully. (ie, is the java part the issue?)

--
Galen Boyer
It seems to me, I remember every single thing I know.