Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Can NOT start second database

Re: Can NOT start second database

From: andrew_webby at hotmail <spam_at_no.thanks.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:44:04 -0000
Message-ID: <974735084.8693.0.nnrp-08.c30bdde2@news.demon.co.uk>

Also, don't go by your swap space to determine how much memory Oracle is taking. Look at articles on SunWorld to see why actually determining memory usage is a lot more complicated thatn that.

"Kevin Haas" <kahaas_at_carolina.rr.com> wrote in message news:3A1810CF.B0145A05_at_carolina.rr.com...
> Thanks.
>
> I fixed it, but I don't think that was the number holding me back. I
 updated
> shmmax to the Oracle recommended number of 4 billion something.
>
> The other thing I did was add more swap space. It seems Oracle grabs a lot
 of
> memory at startup some RAM and some SWAP. Here is how I did it as root:
>
> 1. mkfile -v 300m /solarissswapfile <--creates a 300MB file
> 2. swap -a /solarusswapfile. <--tells Solaris to use this file for swap
>
> This gave Solaris enough swap space to work with.
>
> "R. Schierbeek" wrote:
>
> > Hello Kevin,
> >
> > correct, shmmax=64MB is much too small.
> > The 2 SGA's should fit into your 256 MB RAM, so be careful about size of
> >
> > db_block_buffer
> > shared_pool_size
> >
> > Each user process get one semaphore, so lower
> >
> > processes to < 20 (or increase semmni)
> >
> > Good luck,
> > Roelof
> >
> > R. Schierbeek, DBA
> > email : info_at_bytelife.com
> > www : www.bytelife.com
> > Kevin Haas <kahaas_at_carolina.rr.com> schreef in berichtnieuws
> > 3A172260.C3FED288_at_carolina.rr.com...
> > > Hello fellow Oracle professionals!
> > >
> > > I can not start two (2) separate databases (instances) on my box.
 While
> > > trying to start the second database the command always fails with
> > > "Unable to start "SON." I know this is memory issue, because I was
 not
> > > able to start the first database back when I only had 128 MB RAM. Now
 I
> > > have 256 MB.
> > > .......
>
Received on Mon Nov 20 2000 - 09:44:04 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US