Re: Help needed urgently

That would have to be one hunker of a database to fully use that DBA's time. I would think that your manager really means that there is a primary DBA per database, who has the authority to make changes and so on. Otherwise you will have chaos. With the current labor shortage (espeically in government where the pay is about half private industry), you need a plan which will scale. What are you going to do about new databases that arrive (they always do) and you don't get funding for new staff?

I'm such a pessimist.

--rvn.

"Speed Razer" <speedrazer_at_NoT_SpamM_usa.net> wrote in message news:5v730todti3282rsoj93587kv9dqvjddpi_at_4ax.com...
> Man, I want to come work for you! One database per DBA sounds like a
> dream job!!
>
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2000 12:46:11 +0800, Ong Yeow Hin
> <oyeowhin_at_starnet.gov.sg> wrote:
>
> >I have a few databases (from different department) residing on 1
> >machine. Currently, there is 1 DBA maintaining all the databases. My
> >boss would like to distribute the management of the database to the
> >various department as follows:
> >- 1 DBA for each Database
> >- The DBAs will not be able to manage other databases except the one he
> >is authorised
> >
> >1) How to implement the above
> >2) Is it recommended to have this kind of setup and are there any
> >implications.
> >
> >I would appreciate if anyone could advise. Thanks in advance.
> >
> >Rgds,
> >YH
>
Received on Sun Nov 05 2000 - 08:09:45 CST