Re: Help needed urgently

From: Ed Stevens <nmmc_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 20:13:28 GMT
Message-ID: <8tshsv$mof$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

A dream job as long as you never want to take a day off and your boss won't let you because you're the only person who can get to "your" database . . .

I'm surprised management is pushing this. Have they considered what they'll do with database-A when DBA-A gets run over by a garbage truck?

--
Ed Stevens
(Opinions are not necessarily those of my employer)



In article <5v730todti3282rsoj93587kv9dqvjddpi_at_4ax.com>,
  Speed Razer <speedrazer_at_NoT_SpamM_usa.net> wrote:


> Man, I want to come work for you!  One database per DBA sounds like a

> dream job!!

>

> On Thu, 02 Nov 2000 12:46:11 +0800, Ong Yeow Hin

> <oyeowhin_at_starnet.gov.sg> wrote:

>

> >I have a few databases (from different department) residing on 1

> >machine. Currently, there is 1 DBA maintaining all the databases. My

> >boss would like to distribute the management of the database to the

> >various department as follows:

> >- 1 DBA for each Database

> >- The DBAs will not be able to manage other databases except the one

 he


> >is authorised

> >

> >1) How to implement the above

> >2) Is it recommended to have this kind of setup and are there any

> >implications.

> >

> >I would appreciate if anyone could advise. Thanks in advance.

> >

> >Rgds,

> >YH

>

>



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Received on Thu Nov 02 2000 - 14:13:28 CST