Re: Oracle Parallel Server (OPS) on Sun Cluster

In article <27ggpsoe9qbca903295aala3kqlfce619k_at_4ax.com>, Joker <joker_at_jokes.r.us> wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Aug 2000 16:57:23 -0400, "Samuel P Howard"
><sam.howard_at_trcinc.com> wrote:
>
>Sun cluster and Veritas cluster are very similar. The main difference
>between Sun Clusters using the HA-oracle and OPS will be the
>failovers.
>
>first, when setting up the cluster for OPS, you have to use CVM
>(cluster volume manager) which isn't as nice as Versitas Volume
>manager. A regular cluster using HAoracle can use Veritas or Sun
>Volume manager (even Disksuite if you want)

Actually, SunCluster can use VxVM 3.0.4 or CVM 2.2.1

>During a failover, there will be a momentary hang as processes are
>switched between the two nodes. In the Sun Cluster using HA-oracle,
>there can be a sixty second hang while volumes are recovered and
>mounted, and then the database is opened on the new node. There is an
>actual loss of communications here, which if you have an app that is
>not written well, the app will hang when it looses connection. There
>are several middleware web content apps that I have dealt with that
>have this problem.
>
>In the OPS situation, since both nodes are active, then there will be
>no lose of connection. The failover time should be less than a
>second. 100% uptime can be a good thing.

There is no "failover" in OPS, since both nodes are active. Clients must reconnect to the surviving node, or oracle must be set up to failover between the nodes using the tnsnames.ora file

>I will be doing something like this next week. 420R cluster, set up
>first with HAoracle, and then rebuild it with OPS for the oracle
>people to test on. No lab space though, so I am going to have a
>crowded desk.
>
>Later,
>Joker
>
>>Hi.
>>
>>We have a development group that is interested in having us setup a Sun
>>Cluster, putting Oracle Parallel Server (OPS) on it, and allowing them to do
>>some app develeopment against it. Any suggestions or limitations that
>>anyone would care to share?
>>
>>Obvously, the unix platform is Sun. Currently, we are trying to decide
>>between E450's (pci - SCI not supported) and E3500's (sbus - SCI supported).

There ARE PCI sci cards supported on the E450, but you must use Solaris 8

>>They are also thinking about making it a 3-node cluster, with only 1-2 nodes
>>running OPS, and any/all of the nodes running parts of the Application (no
>>idea what the App is supposed to do yet). Any comments about mixing the
>>Application on the same nodes as the OPS instances?
>>
>>What other alternatives are there to OPS? How does Veritas Cluster Server
>>compare (OPS not supported at this time) with Oracle HA/Hot Standby?
>>
>>Please cc: my e-mail for any followups.
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Sam
>
Received on Mon Aug 14 2000 - 14:14:27 CDT