Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!

Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!

From: Norris <jcheong_at_cooper.com.hk>
Date: 2000/03/14
Message-ID: <8akc04$2rd8$1@adenine.netfront.net>#1/1

Every database vendor claims its new version product can lower the total cost of ownership. Which one should I believe?

In comp.databases.sybase DNP <High.Flight_at_btinternet.com> wrote:
> As a famous author in the U.K. said :-
 

> "There's lies, damned lies and statistics."
 

> TPC is all well and good, but does it take into account systematic
> shortcomings of the producst which happen periodically (but certainly
> probably not during an intensive test).
 

> Another thing TPC calcs don't take into account is
> vendor-technology-churn risk. I.e. is Microsoft still going to be
> actually selling and supporting the products and OS versions used here
> in 3 yrs time? If there's any doubt, then the cost to upgrade has to be
> taken as a total cost of ownership hence total cost of transaction
> performance.
 

> I don't need statistics to guide me towards good products, I prefer
> first hand recommendations.
 

> David P.
 

> --------------------------------------------------------

> Norris wrote:

>> 
>> To see MS innovations and how SQL Server 2000 achieved world record TPC-C performance and price/performance results:
>> 
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/isapi/msdnlib.idc?theURL=/library/backgrnd/html/megasrvs.htm
>> 
>> In comp.databases.sybase Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam> wrote:
>> > On 9 Mar 2000 02:00:23 GMT, Norris <jcheong_at_cooper.com.hk> wrote:
 

>> >>>> > Everything any culture on the planet has today is >> >>>> > ALL built on somebody else's work.  

>> > Don't have the slightest problem with this. That's what makes progress >> > work.  

>> > PROVIDED we are talking about "building on".  

>> > Badge-engineering and term re-invention like MS does all the time
>> > is what I'm against. This is not the same as "building on somebody
>> > else's work".  This is crap, desguised as marketing.
 
>> > Many years ago, it was the norm to use tar and feathers for what MS
>> > marketing does. Nowadays, the stock market hikes up the share price >> > when MS re-names something instead of "building on something"...  
>> > Cheers
>> > Nuno Souto
>> > nsouto_at_nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam
>> > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/the_Den/index.html
>> 
>> --
>> http://www.cooper.com.hk
>> http://sybooks.sybase.com/onlinebooks


-- 
http://www.cooper.com.hk
http://sybooks.sybase.com/onlinebooks
Received on Tue Mar 14 2000 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US