Re: Replication - Can it be virtually real time ?

From: Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:00:09 +0100
Message-ID: <951135962.5653.0.pluto.d4ee154e@news.demon.nl>

You could equally well argue against replication due to the latency caused by the dbms_job mechanism. I have a feeling that latency (having worked with replication) is bigger.

Regards,

Sybrand bakker, Oracle DBA

<b_aggy_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:88r6fd$slq$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> Hi People,
>
> Can Oracle's replication be virtually real time and still be
> Asynchronous?
>
> I need a standby but with minimal loss during a disaster. Oracle's
> Standby mechanism would appear to have a higher risk of data loss than
> that of a replication mechanism due to the latency of the log transfers.
>
> Your thoughts/ideas welcomed.
>
> Rick
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
Received on Mon Feb 21 2000 - 06:00:09 CST