Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Checkpoint stalls database for seconds
Hi,
we're doing some initial benchmarking of an OLTP application performing about 100 updates and 2-300 insert a second. 1 session is estimated to be 1 update and 2-3 inserts. Initial results showed 200 sessions a second, but it has dropped to 100 because of problems with checkpoints.
First let me point out that I'm not a DBA, but have consulted several to get to this configuration.
What we see is that a checkpoint stalls the database for a couple of seconds, and since this is a real-time system that is not tolerated. Where would you suggest we start digging?
Platform is Oracle 8.0.5, Sun Solaris on a Sun 450, 4 CPUs and 2GB ram and around 10 disks. No RAID, just plain 10.000 RPM disks. Redo logs are stored on a separate disk with direct-io enabled.
Configuration clips:
rollback_segments=(r1,r2,r3,r4)
db_files = 100
open_cursors = 256
db_file_multiblock_read_count = 32 db_block_buffers = 12800 ## 100M - memory size dependent db_block_lru_latches = 4 ## set = number of cpu's buffer_pool_keep = 8192 shared_pool_size = 120Moptimizer_mode = FIRST_ROWS
dml_locks = 500 log_buffer = 262144 ## 256K log_simultaneous_copies = 8 ## 2 * cpu_count log_small_entry_max_size = 32 ## no copy_latch for_log_upd.below bytes
lgwr_io_slaves = 4 ## min. one for each disk/raid channel log_checkpoints_to_alert = false ## to save time?? sequence_cache_entries = 100 sequence_cache_hash_buckets = 89 max_dump_file_size = 20480 ## 10M # max trace file large_pool_min_alloc = 128K object_cache_optimal_size = 65536 object_cache_max_size_percent = 100 row_cache_cursors = 60 session_cached_cursors = 20 sessions = 100 processes = 250 db_writer_processes = 1 ## usely adequate on async i/o
Tables are partitioned, so that the table we update frequently is spread on 3 disks, and the index on 3 other disks. I'm sure our own DBA will be able to tweak it further, but I would like to hear other opinions as well as he has left the office for today :-)
Thanks for any suggestions,
Brian
Received on Wed Feb 02 2000 - 14:06:50 CST