Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Table defragmentation/resizing question: Is this dangerous ?

Re: Table defragmentation/resizing question: Is this dangerous ?

From: Jeremiah Wilton <jeremiah_at_wolfenet.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:03:27 -0800
Message-ID: <3884D51F.265B0EA5@wolfenet.com>


Oracle 7.3.4 supports MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED.

Obviously, if users are allowed to work on the table before it is completely loaded, they will not see data that is supposed to be there, and perhaps they will accidentally insert new data that already exists but has not yet been loaded.
--
Jeremiah

Guy Dallaire wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:28:02 GMT, gdallair_at_criq.qc.ca (Guy Dallaire)
> wrote:
>
> >Suddenly, I'm starting to doubt about a procedure used here:
> >
> >- On a production database, table A goes to its MAX EXTENT REACHED
> >
> >Resolution:
> >
> >- The DBA exports the table with export (CONSISTENT=Y)
> >- The DBA drops the table (Or truncates and adjust storage)
> >- The DBA re-imports the table
> >
> >Is this OK or should I arrange for ALL USERS to exit and prevent them
> >to connect during this intervention ?
> >
> >If the DBA permits the users to connect whil fixing the problem, while
> >the table is dropped and while it is in the process of being reloaded,
> >I wonder what happens if users are hitting the table (inserting or
> >deleting in it).
> >
> >Isn't the integrity of the data compromised ?
> >
> >
> >Thanks
>
> Please not that my question is not wheter it is useful or not to
> defrag this table, but wether or not doing so while users are
> connected is dangerous.
>
> I cant put an UNLIMITED extents to this table because I'm running
> 7.3.4
Received on Tue Jan 18 2000 - 15:03:27 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US