Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Data storage question

Re: Data storage question

From: Jerry Gitomer <jgitomer_at_hbsrx.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:11:48 -0400
Message-ID: <7ps6of$cp1$1@autumn.news.rcn.net>


Hi,

    Normalize. Create an attribute table and do joins when you must. If you design your indexes and queries properly you won't see much if any performance degradation.

    Given the size of both RAM and the current generation hard drives 5 million row tables don't present any performance problems (again assuming proper indexing and properly written queries). In fact if you are using Oracle 8 you can lock your indexes in RAM and your system will fly.

regards
Jerry Gitomer

Nandakumar wrote in message <7ps4dk$flr$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>...
>Absolutely i agree with you! More parameters might be required
in
>future. But what is the solution?. How would you cater for the
>increasing columns? Do you suggest a relationalized hierarchical
>structure? But this way, number of records will be enormous!
Joins on
>huge tables will worsen the performance.
>
>
>
>In article <7prv0f$iqq$1_at_autumn.news.rcn.net>,
> "Jerry Gitomer" <jgitomer_at_hbsrx.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> From a relational point of view you have a bad design. In
>> essence you are storing an array in each row of the table.
True,
>> when using Oracle, it won't waste space, but what happens the
day
>> one item requires 11 attributes? (As improbable as that
sounds
>> to you today the probability of it happening is very close to
1!)
>>
>> regards
>> Jerry Gitomer
>>
>> Nandakumar wrote in message <7pkl9o$hfp$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>...
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I need to store the attributes of an item in a table. The
>> attributes are
>> >not pre-defined, but there is a maximum limit to the number
of
>> >attributes, say 10. Initially there will only be "2"
attributes
>> that
>> >would be stored in database. Unknown attributes are stored as
>> NULLs.
>> >
>> >So i decide to go for a table with 10 varchar2 fields for
the
>> >attributes.
>> >
>> >Say, data are stored in this fashion in the database and the
>> number of
>> >records has reached 5(or more) million.
>> >
>> >Now, if i find out that there won't be any need to store more
>> than "2"
>> >attributes in the table how bad is my design of the table.
How
>> much
>> >storage space would i have saved had i designed the table
with
>> just "2"
>> >varchar2 fields?
>> >
>> >mmm! i hear you all say this is an one line question!!
>> >Thanks
>> >--
>> >Nandakumar
>> >Systems Analyst
>> >New York
>> >(N.Kumar_at_rocketmail.com)
>> >
>> >
>> >Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>> >Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>>
>>
>
>--
>Nandakumar
>Systems Analyst
>New York
>(N.Kumar_at_rocketmail.com)
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Received on Mon Aug 23 1999 - 14:11:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US