Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Index rebuilding behavior

Re: Index rebuilding behavior

From: Pete Sharman <psharman_at_us.oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:44:25 -0700
Message-ID: <37B19A59.2DDF145B@us.oracle.com>


Strange behaviour, this. I've yet to see an object that is not partitioned span tablespaces. Can you provide the statement you're running and the output from it?

Pete

skubiszewski_at_Eisner.DECUS.Org wrote:

> In article <7ocl5d$n5v$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>, Tim_Cuthbertson_at_sonat.com writes:
> >In article <FFyG1o.DEp_at_news.decus.org>,
> > skubiszewski_at_Eisner.DECUS.Org wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> How does rebuild work?
> >>
> >> Rose
> >>
> >
> >I am sorry, but I cannot understand what you are describing. An index
> >is a segment, and a segment can only have extents in one tablespace
> >(unless it is a partioned index in Oracle 8 +). Is it a partitioned
> >index?
>
> I'm using Oracle v7.3.4. If I query the extents that comprise the
> index, I see 24 total, in various sizes and tablespaces.
>
> After I issue an "alter index <name> rebuild storage (initial xxx
> next xxx pctincrease 0) tablespace yyy", I see 6 extents, in various
> sizes and tablespaces for the index.
>
> I expected extents of size xxx in tablespace yyy but that's not
> what happened and I'm curious why. Rebuild does not appear to
> honor the storage clause?
>
> Rose

--
Regards

Pete


Received on Wed Aug 11 1999 - 10:44:25 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US