Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Y2K problem of Oracle 7.1.6

Re: Y2K problem of Oracle 7.1.6

From: Jurij Modic <jmodic_at_src.si>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 16:46:14 GMT
Message-ID: <368366b6.1098085@news.siol.net>


On Tue, 22 Dec 1998 08:24:47 GMT, Karol Michaliak <delta_at_internet.sk> wrote:

>What does it mean? Is the imp/exp useless when in the database are dates
>with year 2000 and more?

No, the *data* in your database has nothing to do with the possible wrong behaviour of the imp/exp utility at the begining of y2k. As Stephen has said, you can easily find what might happen by looking at catexp.sql yourself.

In short, if you are not performing incremental export (complete, cumulative, incremental) around the begining of the y2k, you'll never hit the bug. Also if you use this incremental export technique and you happen to run cumulative export before the incremental one in the year 2000 then you'll never know there was a bug hidden in the definition of some export supporting dictionary views.

Anyway, the easiest cure for this bug would be to open the catexp.sql with your editor and replace any occurance of the

   TO_DATE('01-01-00','DD-MM-YY')
with

   TO_DATE('01-01-1900','DD-MM-YYYY')
and rerun this script.

>Thanks,
>Karol

HTH, Jurij Modic <jmodic_at_src.si>
Certified Oracle7 DBA (OCP)



The above opinions are mine and do not represent any official standpoints of my employer Received on Fri Dec 25 1998 - 10:46:14 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US