Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Why MINEXTENT value should be greater than 1 for rollback segment?

Re: Why MINEXTENT value should be greater than 1 for rollback segment?

From: Steve Phelan <stevep_at_XXnospamXX.toneline.demon.co.uk>
Date: 1998/03/31
Message-ID: <891330212.19850.0.nnrp-07.c2de712e@news.demon.co.uk>#1/1

The rollback segment extents are used in a cyclic fashion. Once a rollback segment needs to extend beyond it's currrent extent, it will never put the 'head' pointer back into the same extent as the 'tail' pointer. Hence - as a minimum - two extents are required to 'form a circle' of extents.

OK, that's a brief simplification, but you really need to understand a lot more about how RBS work. Check the Backup and Recovery Handbook (Oracle Press) and the Oracle 'concepts' manual that ship with the product, they'll give you a good start.

Steve Phelan.

manoj67_at_hotmail.com wrote in message <6fpigh$ie2$1_at_nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>I am trying to understand why the Minimum Number of
>Extents for a Rollback Segments should be more than
>1. When you create a rollback segment Oracle
>returns error. I want to know the logic behind it.
>
>Does anyone know the answer?
>
>Manoj
>
>-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Received on Tue Mar 31 1998 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US