Re: Oracle CLOB
From: Gerard H. Pille <ghp_at_skynet.be>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:43:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4c9badc3$0$14252$ba620e4c_at_news.skynet.be>
The Magnet wrote:
> On Sep 23, 11:36 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
>> The Magnet wrote:
>>
>> Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K.
>
>
> 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a
> VARCHAR2? That makes no sense.
>
> A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a
> CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do
> you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also.
>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:43:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4c9badc3$0$14252$ba620e4c_at_news.skynet.be>
The Magnet wrote:
> On Sep 23, 11:36 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
>> The Magnet wrote:
>>
>> Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K.
>
>
> 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a
> VARCHAR2? That makes no sense.
>
> A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a
> CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do
> you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also.
>
Why don't you crawl back under your stone? Received on Thu Sep 23 2010 - 14:43:00 CDT