Re: Oracle CLOB
From: The Magnet <art_at_unsu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <439e2253-9d41-43eb-9387-c5164378bfac_at_j2g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 23, 2:43 pm, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
> The Magnet wrote:
> > On Sep 23, 11:36 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
> >> The Magnet wrote:
>
> >> Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K.
>
> > 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a
> > VARCHAR2? That makes no sense.
>
> > A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a
> > CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do
> > you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also.
>
> Why don't you crawl back under your stone?
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <439e2253-9d41-43eb-9387-c5164378bfac_at_j2g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 23, 2:43 pm, "Gerard H. Pille" <g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
> The Magnet wrote:
> > On Sep 23, 11:36 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g..._at_skynet.be> wrote:
> >> The Magnet wrote:
>
> >> Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K.
>
> > 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a
> > VARCHAR2? That makes no sense.
>
> > A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a
> > CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do
> > you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also.
>
> Why don't you crawl back under your stone?
I see you forgot to take your medication today. Received on Thu Sep 23 2010 - 23:18:08 CDT