Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Performance: "pl/sql" vs. "OS b-tree files"

Re: Performance: "pl/sql" vs. "OS b-tree files"

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:45:58 +0100
Message-ID: <40694fe8$0$3309$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


Performance is *always* important - even if it is explicitly stated that it isn't.

create or replace trigger perf_unimportant after logon on database
begin
dbms_lock.sleep(3600);
end;
/

with a grant execute on the appropriate package to public should illustrate nicely.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
"Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:40693774$0$16966$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...

> 'sOK. I got told today that performance in mine
> was not important...
>
> Now, THAT is new!
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
> "Ignacio" <barbudo_at_ono.com> wrote in message
> news:a4U9c.1040$9c.130331_at_news.ono.com...
> > we're developing an application in which performance is a very important
> > issue (what a new!:)
>
Received on Tue Mar 30 2004 - 04:45:58 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US