Re: SQL Server Worm devastates Microsoft Corporate networks!

Sinister Midget <xunil_at_kc-rr.com> scribbled:

> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:08:02 GMT, simoncooke_at_earthlink.net drooled
> and scribbled:
>> Sinister Midget <xunil_at_kc-rr.com> scribbled:
>>> M$ does it, it's somebody else's fault and/or how could the actual
>>> users possibly know they should apply the patches that $EMPLOYER
>>> releases?
>>>
>>> Only one standard there. MICROS~1 isn't to blame no matter what.
>>
>> Sounds most of the posters here in reverse - you know; you all claim
>> that Microsoft is to blame no matter what, and then make up lies
>> about how (for example) Windows can't handle 1000 simultaneous
>> processes.
>
> [see below]
>
> You're right (though I never made the claim). Winders _CAN_ perform
> 1000 instances of nothing, and you proved it admirably. I'll go one
> further and state that if you want to claim it can do 20,000 instances
> of nothing all at the same time, you're correct!
>
> You win. You can leave with some nice parting gifts.

You seemed to miss the posts where I (and others) put in that Ackerman (IIRC) test.

And everything ran smooth.

Simon Received on Wed Jan 29 2003 - 13:32:17 CST