Re: SQL Server Worm devastates Microsoft Corporate networks!

From: Sinister Midget <xunil_at_kc-rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:57:48 GMT
Message-ID: <c8dlg-tmg.ln1@elstinko.registrado.network.es>

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:08:02 GMT, simoncooke_at_earthlink.net drooled and scribbled:
> Sinister Midget <xunil_at_kc-rr.com> scribbled:

>> M$ does it, it's somebody else's fault and/or how could the actual
>> users possibly know they should apply the patches that $EMPLOYER
>> releases?
>>
>> Only one standard there. MICROS~1 isn't to blame no matter what.

>
> Sounds most of the posters here in reverse - you know; you all claim
> that Microsoft is to blame no matter what, and then make up lies about
> how (for example) Windows can't handle 1000 simultaneous processes.

[see below]

You're right (though I never made the claim). Winders _CAN_ perform 1000 instances of nothing, and you proved it admirably. I'll go one further and state that if you want to claim it can do 20,000 instances of nothing all at the same time, you're correct!

You win. You can leave with some nice parting gifts.

> Simon

Sinister

[I coulda put back in the part about $MONOPOLY passing the buck when other users fail to patch things, the part that was snipped, but I thought this would suffice.]

-- 
"One world, one web, one program"  -- Microsoft promotional ad
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer"  -- Adolf Hitler

Received on Wed Jan 29 2003 - 10:57:48 CST