17 instances, with 17 databases. No OPS (We are running 3 or 4 diferent
versions
of 8i both 32 and 64 bit)
It can get ugly, I wouldn't recommend going to that many,
we have hit every imaginable system limit at one time or another. But it
works.
It is a hoot to say the least.
"damorgan" <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
news:3DEFE8B0.3B2F52F6_at_exesolutions.com...
> Steve Ashmore wrote:
>
> > One 'down' of the top of my head would be if you ever wanted to
> > run multiple instances on a server. Believe it or not we have one
> > development server with 17 instances on it.
> >
> > Stephen C. Ashmore
> > Brainbench MVP for Oracle Administration
> > http://www.brainbench.com
> > Author of: 'So You Want to be an Oracle DBA?'
> >
> > "TurkBear" <john.greco_at_dot.state.mn.us> wrote in message
> > news:mgivuu4if2iur4jgeolb682mrp9d8nke08_at_4ax.com...
> > > Or in addition to..
> > >
> > > I have heard that there are some issues with this method, but not what
> > they may be..
> > >
> > > It would be easier to manage new instances if all we had to do was
> > register them with an alias in our DNS server...
> > > ( this will all be on our Intranet)
> > > Opinions, please?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
>
> Not to be picky on semantics but ... 17 instances ... or 17 databases?
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
Received on Fri Dec 06 2002 - 05:40:07 CST
