Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: NT vs 2K for Oracle (WAS) Re: About 9i on Windows

Re: NT vs 2K for Oracle (WAS) Re: About 9i on Windows

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:27:15 +0100
Message-ID: <3bb9cecb$0$227$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


Not Oracle specific (though I do like the ability to add seperate drives as subdirectories). My comment was based upon the stability,scalability and performance of the OS. I think that our win2k servers have yet to need rebooting,( with the exception of software installs).

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
"Galen Boyer" <galendboyer_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:usnd23ku1.fsf_-__at_verizon.net...

> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk wrote:
>
> > win2k is absolutely miles better than NT4.
>
> From an Oracle perspective, why is this?
> --
> Galen Boyer
> Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground.
Received on Tue Oct 02 2001 - 09:27:15 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US