Then I would be very, very tempted to give them regular report.txts filled
with all those ratios and waits and explain that these are the metrics you
use to monitor performance and they are documented in the various oracle
manuals. Quite frankly this sort of daftness needs to be stamped on. Yes it
is reasonable for our performance to be measured, but you should measure it
against the job that we are contracted to do. If your user community is only
interested on uptime then that is all an auditor should be interested in.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
"David Van Zandt" <dvanzandt_at_iquest.net> wrote in message
news:dW%_6.34$q34.32879_at_news1.iquest.net...
> Thanks John and Niall for your input. Your suggestions well illustrate
the
> difficultly of this decision. No, there is no precedent, nor do the user
> community give a flip as long as we minimize unscheduled outages.
> Notwithstanding these facts, the auditors "expect" trends as a
documentation
> requirement; and that foolishness will not change within the next month, I
> fear.
>
> What I was trolling for were suggestions of what others may have found
> useful to track, in order to broaden my range of ideas.
>
> Thanks again for your input!
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Jun 29 2001 - 11:16:24 CDT
