Re: MS Access usefulness and size restrictions

From: Richard H. Rowson <richard_at_rhrowson.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:26:40 +0100
Message-ID: <9g8b9t$4i7$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>

Niall,

I like that one

--
Regards,

Richard H. Rowson

"Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message
news:3b271bd5$0$12247$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...


> "Richard H. Rowson" <richard_at_rhrowson.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message

> news:9g6288$r99$1_at_news6.svr.pol.co.uk...

> > Anecdotal evidence from a software house was that Oracle took 4 man days

 to


> > install on an NT4 server. SQL Server took 30 minutes. Which one do you

 think


> > many clients prefer if they do not need the sheer horse power of Oracle?

>

> Then put simply that software house did not know what it was doing. Yes

 the


> Oracle installer is , how shall we say, somewhat esoterically designed. It

> still works though. hey you can even use the tried and tested IT

> professional approach of just clicking next until the install stops.

>

>

> --

> Niall Litchfield

> Oracle DBA

> Audit Commission UK

>

>

Received on Wed Jun 13 2001 - 13:26:40 CDT